Fogaskerékgyár page

  1. Competitors
    Fogaskerékgyár.hu’s main competitors on the Hungarian market include:
    • Fogaskerekek.hu – Specializes in gear manufacturing and gearbox repair.
    • Fogaskerekgyarto.hu – Sárközi János, mechanical engineer master, manufactures gears and fine mechanical components.
    • TóthGearbox.hu – Focuses on gear manufacturing, gearbox production, and gearbox repair.
    • Hard-Ferr.hu – Specializes in gear manufacturing and CNC machining.
  2. Heuristic Evaluation (Expert Review)
    I reviewed the current Fogaskerekgyár.hu website and identified the following UX issues:
    • Navigation Problems: The menu is not clear enough, and users cannot quickly find the information they need.
    • Outdated Visual Design: The current interface does not follow modern UI/UX trends, which negatively affects user experience.
    • Missing Clear CTAs (Calls to Action): The quote request and contact buttons are not prominent.
    • Responsiveness Issues: The site is not optimized for mobile, with small text and difficult navigation.
  3. Competitor Analysis
    I compared the website to three industry competitors and found the following strengths and weaknesses:
    • UI, clear product presentation
    • Few interactive elements
    • UX design, fast loading time
    • Complex quote request process
    • Mobile optimization
    • Too text-heavy, lack of visual elements
  4. Conclusion
    Compared to competitors, Fogaskerékgyár.hu lags behind in terms of UX, requiring improvements in visual design, better navigation, and an optimized quote request process.
  5. Target Audience
    The main target audience for the website is industrial companies, engineers, and procurement managers.
  6. Interviews and Surveys
    I conducted surveys for existing customers with the following key questions:
    • How easy is it to find the products you are looking for?
    • How would you rate the ordering/quote request process?
    • What issues have you encountered on the website?
    Results:
    • 68% said navigation is not intuitive
    • 55% complained about the complexity of the quote request process
    • 72% felt the website was outdated and untrustworthy
  7. Usability Test
    I conducted a test with 5 users, asking them to complete the following tasks:
    • Find a specific product
    • Initiate contact
    • Request a quote
    Observations:
    • Users took an average of 3 minutes to find a product (slow navigation).
    • 40% could not find the contact page on their first try.
    • 60% abandoned the quote request due to the amount of information required.
    Conclusions and Recommendations:
    • Modernized UI/UX: A cleaner, more user-friendly interface is needed.
    • Better Navigation: Simplified menu structure and clearer pages.
    • User-Friendly Quote Request Process: Fewer mandatory fields, clearer CTAs.
    • Mobile Optimization: Responsive design with an easy-to-use mobile version.
  8. User Personas
    • Kovács Péter – Procurement Manager
      Age: 45
      Position: Procurement Manager at an industrial supplier company
      Goals: Quickly find suitable gears and components, easily request quotes
      Pain Points: Difficult navigation, long quote request process
      UX Solution: Clear category pages, quick search, short quote request form
    • Tóth Gábor – Mechanical Engineer
      Age: 38
      Position: Technical Director at a manufacturing company
      Goals: Easy access to technical specifications, clear product pages
      Pain Points: Poorly structured product information, difficult-to-read mobile data
      UX Solution: Clear technical data, downloadable PDF catalogs, responsive tables
    • Nagy Éva – SME CEO
      Age: 50
      Position: Owner of a small business
      Goals: Find a reliable supplier, build trust through the website
      Pain Points: Uncertainty about reliability due to outdated website
      UX Solution: Modern design, customer reviews, prominent contact options